Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Keates v. Woodford
No. 8628636 · Decided February 23, 2007
No. 8628636·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 23, 2007
Citation
No. 8628636
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Vincent E. Keates appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. Keates contends that the district court erred in determining that his petition was time-barred because he has not had an administrative hearing and because he suffers a “new due process violation every day that [he] is illegally incarcerated.” We disagree and affirm the district court’s order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1); Redd v. McGrath, 343 F.3d 1077, 1083 (9th Cir.2003) (“limitations period begins to run when the new evidence should have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence”). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Keates appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01Keates appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
02Keates contends that the district court erred in determining that his petition was time-barred because he has not had an administrative hearing and because he suffers a “new due process violation every day that [he] is illegally incarcerate
03McGrath, 343 F.3d 1077, 1083 (9th Cir.2003) (“limitations period begins to run when the new evidence should have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
Keates appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Keates v. Woodford in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 23, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628636 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.