Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8820375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jung Joong v. White
No. 8820375 · Decided October 25, 1917
No. 8820375·Ninth Circuit · 1917·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 25, 1917
Citation
No. 8820375
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. By consent of counsel for the respective parties, ordered, appeal dismissed for the noncompliance by appellant with provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court ( 150 Fed. cxxix , cxxxi, 79-C. C. A. cxxix, cxxxi).
Plain English Summary
By consent of counsel for the respective parties, ordered, appeal dismissed for the noncompliance by appellant with provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court ( 150 Fed.
Key Points
01By consent of counsel for the respective parties, ordered, appeal dismissed for the noncompliance by appellant with provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court ( 150 Fed.
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
By consent of counsel for the respective parties, ordered, appeal dismissed for the noncompliance by appellant with provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court ( 150 Fed.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jung Joong v. White in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 25, 1917.
Use the citation No. 8820375 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.