Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Julius Lee Gillespie v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General, Jack Wayne, Marshal, Michael O'brien, Marshal, John Doe, Superintendents 1-10, John Doe, Marshals 11-20, John Doe, Guards 21-100, Individually and in Their Official Capacity and Their Employees, Agents, Subordinates and Assignees, and United States of America
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 381865
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Julius Lee Gillespie v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General, Jack Wayne, Marshal, Michael O'brien, Marshal, John Doe, Superintendents 1-10, John Doe, Marshals 11-20, John Doe, Guards 21-100, Individually and in Their Official Capacity and Their Employees, Agents, Subordinates and Assignees, and United States of America
No. 381865 · Decided October 6, 1980
No. 381865·Ninth Circuit · 1980·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 6, 1980
Citation
No. 381865
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Julius Lee Gillespie v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General, Jack Wayne, Marshal, Michael O'brien, Marshal, John Doe, Superintendents 1-10, John Doe, Marshals 11-20, John Doe, Guards 21-100, Individually and in Their Official Capacity and Their Employees, Agents, Subordinates and Assignees, and United States of America is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Julius Lee Gillespie v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General, Jack Wayne, Marshal, Michael O'brien, Marshal, John Doe, Superintendents 1-10, John Doe, Marshals 11-20, John Doe, Guards 21-100, Individually and in Their Official Capacity and Their Employees, Agents, Subordinates and Assignees, and United States of America in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 6, 1980.
Use the citation No. 381865 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.