FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629404
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Judge v. Adams

No. 8629404 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 8629404 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8629404
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * There is no dispute that Judge’s petition for habeas corpus was untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1). Because Judge has not shown that ‘“extraordinary circumstances beyond [his] control ma[d]e it impossible to file a petition on time,’ ” Spitsyn v. Moore, 345 F.3d 796, 799 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting Brambles v. Duncan, 330 F.3d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.2003)), he is not entitled to equitable tolling. Ordinary attorney negligence is not enough to toll the limitations period, “ ‘lest the exceptions swallow the rule.’” Id. (quoting Miranda v. Castro, 292 F.3d 1063,1066 (9th Cir.2002)). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * There is no dispute that Judge’s petition for habeas corpus was untimely under 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * There is no dispute that Judge’s petition for habeas corpus was untimely under 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Judge v. Adams in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629404 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →