FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 3064352
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Juan MacHic Salayon v. Eric Holder, Jr.

No. 3064352 · Decided July 23, 2012
No. 3064352 · Ninth Circuit · 2012 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 23, 2012
Citation
No. 3064352
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 23 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUAN A. MACHIC SALAYON, a.k.a. No. 09-73898 Jose Sacayon Sanchez, Agency No. A075-304-234 Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 17, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. Juan A. Machic Salayon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. The BIA found that Salayon failed to reasonably challenge the bases for the IJ’s denial of his applications for relief from removal and dismissed his appeal. Salayon does not contend the BIA erred in dismissing his appeal on this basis. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed waived). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Salayon’s asylum and withholding of removal claims. We lack jurisdiction to review Salayon’s unexhausted claim that the IJ violated his due process rights by failing to fully develop the record. See Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2008). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 09-73898
Plain English Summary
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 17, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 17, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Juan MacHic Salayon v. Eric Holder, Jr. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 23, 2012.
Use the citation No. 3064352 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →