Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9385474
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Joseph Leon v. David Cena
No. 9385474 · Decided March 21, 2023
No. 9385474·Ninth Circuit · 2023·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 21, 2023
Citation
No. 9385474
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH R. LEON, No. 22-15794
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-06317-CRB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAVID A. CENA, Judge; ERIC S.
GEFFON, Judge; CYNTHIA SERVELY,
Judge; OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF; OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL FOR THE
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF
SANTA CLARA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 14, 2023**
Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
California pretrial detainee Joseph R. Leon appeals pro se the district court’s
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that an excessive bail
order violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
Byrd v. Maricopa County Bd. of Supervisors, 845 F.3d 919, 922 (9th Cir. 2017).
We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Leon’s bail-related claims for damages
as barred by absolute judicial immunity. See Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072,
1075 (9th Cir. 1986) (judges are entitled to absolute judicial immunity for acts
performed in their official capacity); see also Galen v. City of Los Angeles, 477
F.3d 652, 663 (9th Cir. 2007) (“California vests judicial officers with the exclusive
authority to enhance or reduce bail.”).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Leon’s motion for
relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) because Leon failed to demonstrate any basis for
relief. See Riley v. Filson, 933 F.3d 1068, 1071 (9th Cir. 2019) (stating standard of
review and grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)).
AFFIRMED.
2
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2023 MOLLY C.
02GEFFON, Judge; CYNTHIA SERVELY, Judge; OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF; OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendants-Appellees.
03Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 14, 2023** Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
04Leon appeals pro se the district court’s * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Joseph Leon v. David Cena in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 21, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9385474 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.