Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626144
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jones v. Strangio
No. 8626144 · Decided November 15, 2006
No. 8626144·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 15, 2006
Citation
No. 8626144
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Melvin Jones, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated in connection with a custody dispute over his daughter. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm because Jones presents no issue of fact that the defendants violated his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated in connection with a custody dispute over his daughter.
03We affirm because Jones presents no issue of fact that the defendants violated his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jones v. Strangio in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 15, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626144 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.