FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8892882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.

No. 8892882 · Decided August 28, 1968
No. 8892882 · Ninth Circuit · 1968 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 28, 1968
Citation
No. 8892882
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: Jones and Howe brought an action against Great Northern Railway Company in the Montana state courts for personal injuries sustained by them in a crossing accident. The action was removed to the federal court by reason of diversity of citizenship. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the two plaintiffs. On a motion by Great Northern for judgment notwithstanding the .verdict, the trial court granted the motion as to Jones, who was the driver of the vehicle in which the two plaintiffs were riding. Jones appeals from the judgment against him. The trial court denied the motion as to Howe, who was a passenger in that vehicle. Great *638 Northern appeals from Howe’s judgment against it. All of the questions raised are questions of Montana law. They were carefully and fully considered by the district judge in a detailed opinion. Our review of the evidence and of the Montana authorities convinces us that all questions presented were correctly decided by the district judge. Affirmed.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: Jones and Howe brought an action against Great Northern Railway Company in the Montana state courts for personal injuries sustained by them in a crossing accident.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: Jones and Howe brought an action against Great Northern Railway Company in the Montana state courts for personal injuries sustained by them in a crossing accident.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 28, 1968.
Use the citation No. 8892882 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →