FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8895268
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Jones v. Coakley

No. 8895268 · Decided November 19, 1969
No. 8895268 · Ninth Circuit · 1969 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 19, 1969
Citation
No. 8895268
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: In this civil rights action, plaintiff Robert A. Jones initially named, as defendants, J. F. Coakley, District Attorney, Jerry G. Murphy, Deputy District Attorney, and Chris G. Gasparich, Deputy Public Defender. On motion of Coakley, who was the only defendant originally served with process, the complaint was dismissed as to him on November 8, 1966, under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jones filed an amended complaint naming the three original defendants and three additional defendants. It was not until after the filing of the amended complaint that service of summons was made upon defendant Gasparich. Service of summons has never been made on the remaining four defendants. On motion of Gasparich the action was dismissed as to him under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 5, 1968. Jones filed a timely notice of appeal referring only to the dismissal order of June 5, 1968. While Jones indicated in his notice of appeal that he regarded that order as a dismissal of the action not only as to Gasparich, but also as to Coakley, the order actually did not dismiss the action as to Coakley. Gasparich, but not Coakley, appeared in this court on the appeal. The appeal must be dismissed because it is not taken from a final decision, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . While, as indicated above, the original complaint was dismissed as to Coakley, the action has never been dismissed as to him. While the action was dismissed as to Gasparich, the pendency of the action as to codefendant Coakley deprives the Gasparich dismissal of finality under Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: In this civil rights action, plaintiff Robert A.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: In this civil rights action, plaintiff Robert A.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jones v. Coakley in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 19, 1969.
Use the citation No. 8895268 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →