Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/John Kenneth Lolli v. County of Orange, a Political Subdivision of the State of California Michael S. Carona, Individually and as Sheriff of Orange County John Rocky Hewitt, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Assistant Sheriff) Toledo, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 3 Meyer, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 4 Walker, Individually and in Their Official Capacities (Sheriff Deputies) AKA Doe 5-8 Baum, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 Finlay, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Kent, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Richards, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Breaton, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 784387
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
John Kenneth Lolli v. County of Orange, a Political Subdivision of the State of California Michael S. Carona, Individually and as Sheriff of Orange County John Rocky Hewitt, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Assistant Sheriff) Toledo, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 3 Meyer, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 4 Walker, Individually and in Their Official Capacities (Sheriff Deputies) AKA Doe 5-8 Baum, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 Finlay, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Kent, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Richards, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Breaton, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10
No. 784387 · Decided November 21, 2003
No. 784387·Ninth Circuit · 2003·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 21, 2003
Citation
No. 784387
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
John Kenneth Lolli v. County of Orange, a Political Subdivision of the State of California Michael S. Carona, Individually and as Sheriff of Orange County John Rocky Hewitt, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Assistant Sheriff) Toledo, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 3 Meyer, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 4 Walker, Individually and in Their Official Capacities (Sheriff Deputies) AKA Doe 5-8 Baum, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 Finlay, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Kent, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Richards, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Breaton, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for John Kenneth Lolli v. County of Orange, a Political Subdivision of the State of California Michael S. Carona, Individually and as Sheriff of Orange County John Rocky Hewitt, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Assistant Sheriff) Toledo, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 3 Meyer, Individually and in His Official Capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) AKA Doe 4 Walker, Individually and in Their Official Capacities (Sheriff Deputies) AKA Doe 5-8 Baum, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 Finlay, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Kent, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Richards, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 5-8 Breaton, Deputy Individually and in His Official Capacity AKA Does 9-10 in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 21, 2003.
Use the citation No. 784387 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.