Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8637562
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jimenez v. Gonzales
No. 8637562 · Decided May 18, 2007
No. 8637562·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 18, 2007
Citation
No. 8637562
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A). Petitioners have cited no authority for their equal protection argument, and Fiallo v. Bell 1 and Ram v. INS 2 foreclose it. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787, 794 , 97 S.Ct. 1473 , 52 L.Ed.2d 50 (1977). . Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir.2001).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C.
02Petitioners have cited no authority for their equal protection argument, and Fiallo v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jimenez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 18, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8637562 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.