Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee?

Accepted Answer

Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on December 16, 1991.

Question 4

How do I cite Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 573216 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month