FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8827491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Jeong Quey How v. White

No. 8827491 · Decided July 7, 1919
No. 8827491 · Ninth Circuit · 1919 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 7, 1919
Citation
No. 8827491
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
GILBERT, Circuit Judge. Appeal is taken from the order of the court below denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant made application to enter the United States as a citizen thereof, claiming to be the foreign-born son of Jeong Sun, a native-born citizen of the United States, and thus entitled to enter the United States under section 1993 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 3947). The appellant was first caused to be examined under the general immigration law, and was found admissible. He was then caused to be examined under the Chinese Exclusion Act, whereupon his application to enter the United States was denied, for want of sufficient proof that he was the son of Jeong Sun, his alleged father. *619 The examination under the Chinese Exclusion Act was had before the immigration inspector. In Quan Hing Sun v. White, 254 Fed. 402 , - C. C. A. -, this court held that the claim of right to enter the United States, made by a Chinese person alleging himself to be a citizen of the United States, must first be determined by a special board of inquiry appointed by the Commission of Immigration, consisting of three members selected from the-immigration officials under Act Feb. 20, 1907, c. 1134, 34 Stat. 898 . This right was denied the appellant, and on the authority of that decision it follows that the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to entertain the petition and grant the writ, unless within such time as the judge of the court below shall deem reasonable proceedings be instituted against the appellant under the provisions of the law as we have construed them.
Plain English Summary
Appeal is taken from the order of the court below denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Appeal is taken from the order of the court below denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jeong Quey How v. White in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 7, 1919.
Use the citation No. 8827491 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →