FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8695426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Jean v. Lynch

No. 8695426 · Decided November 25, 2015
No. 8695426 · Ninth Circuit · 2015 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 25, 2015
Citation
No. 8695426
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Tra Bi Jean, á native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal *459 proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Jean’s untimely motion to reopen because he did not establish materially changed circumstances in the Ivory Coast to overcome the time limitation for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 988-89 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening); see also Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996-97 (9th Cir.2008) (evidence was not material in light of prior adverse credibility determination). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Tra Bi Jean, á native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal *459 proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Tra Bi Jean, á native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal *459 proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jean v. Lynch in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 25, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8695426 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →