Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Jartech, Inc. Anatuna, Inc. Cinema Seven, Inc. And Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy Gordon Bricken James E. Ward David L. Brandt David F. Ortiz, James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/appellants v. Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a General Partnership, Counter-Defendants/appellees
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 397929
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Jartech, Inc. Anatuna, Inc. Cinema Seven, Inc. And Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy Gordon Bricken James E. Ward David L. Brandt David F. Ortiz, James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/appellants v. Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a General Partnership, Counter-Defendants/appellees
No. 397929 · Decided January 25, 1982
No. 397929·Ninth Circuit · 1982·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 25, 1982
Citation
No. 397929
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Jartech, Inc. Anatuna, Inc. Cinema Seven, Inc. And Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy Gordon Bricken James E. Ward David L. Brandt David F. Ortiz, James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/appellants v. Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a General Partnership, Counter-Defendants/appellees is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Jartech, Inc. Anatuna, Inc. Cinema Seven, Inc. And Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy Gordon Bricken James E. Ward David L. Brandt David F. Ortiz, James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/appellants v. Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a General Partnership, Counter-Defendants/appellees in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 25, 1982.
Use the citation No. 397929 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.