Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642378
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Isaeva v. Gonzales
No. 8642378 · Decided August 15, 2007
No. 8642378·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8642378
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as there were multiple inconsistencies between Isaeva’s testimony and asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B). The IJ’s finding that Isaeva didn’t show she is eligible for asylum is therefore supported by the record. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004) (upholding denial of asylum because of inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony and application). Likewise, Isaeva isn’t eligible for withholding of removal, see Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003), or relief under the Convention Against Torture, see id. at 1157 . PETITION DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as there were multiple inconsistencies between Isaeva’s testimony and asylum application.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as there were multiple inconsistencies between Isaeva’s testimony and asylum application.
02The IJ’s finding that Isaeva didn’t show she is eligible for asylum is therefore supported by the record.
03Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004) (upholding denial of asylum because of inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony and application).
04Likewise, Isaeva isn’t eligible for withholding of removal, see Farah v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as there were multiple inconsistencies between Isaeva’s testimony and asylum application.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Isaeva v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642378 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.