Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7203095
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ireland Bank v. Hollingsworth
No. 7203095 · Decided December 27, 2001
No. 7203095·Ninth Circuit · 2001·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 27, 2001
Citation
No. 7203095
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Bill Hollingsworth appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion. Bateman v. United States Postal Serv., 231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. Because Hollingsworth waited over five years from the entry of judgment to file his Rule 60(b) motion, and failed to explain *841 the delay, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See Ashford v. Steuart, 657 F.2d 1053, 1054-55 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Bill Hollingsworth appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Bill Hollingsworth appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P.
02United States Postal Serv., 231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2000).
03Because Hollingsworth waited over five years from the entry of judgment to file his Rule 60(b) motion, and failed to explain *841 the delay, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely.