Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/In Re Asbestos Cases. (Two Cases) Hoo Kin Chang and Ethel F.O. Chang v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Charles Chun, Raymond Judd and Carinthia Judd, Moses Ho and Fanny Ho, Richard Lau and Janet C. Lau v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 506266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Re Asbestos Cases. (Two Cases) Hoo Kin Chang and Ethel F.O. Chang v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Charles Chun, Raymond Judd and Carinthia Judd, Moses Ho and Fanny Ho, Richard Lau and Janet C. Lau v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
No. 506266 · Decided May 23, 1988
No. 506266·Ninth Circuit · 1988·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 23, 1988
Citation
No. 506266
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
In Re Asbestos Cases. (Two Cases) Hoo Kin Chang and Ethel F.O. Chang v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Charles Chun, Raymond Judd and Carinthia Judd, Moses Ho and Fanny Ho, Richard Lau and Janet C. Lau v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for In Re Asbestos Cases. (Two Cases) Hoo Kin Chang and Ethel F.O. Chang v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Charles Chun, Raymond Judd and Carinthia Judd, Moses Ho and Fanny Ho, Richard Lau and Janet C. Lau v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Formerly Known as Johns-Manville Products Corp., and Raymark Industries, Inc., Successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 23, 1988.
Use the citation No. 506266 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.