Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689222
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Herships v. Superior Court
No. 8689222 · Decided September 15, 2008
No. 8689222·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 15, 2008
Citation
No. 8689222
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. A review of the record and the response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). It does not appear that the district court erred in dismissing the action in light of principles of comity and federalism. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-46 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
02A review of the record and the response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.