FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Hernandez v. Keisler

No. 8644618 · Decided October 18, 2007
No. 8644618 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 18, 2007
Citation
No. 8644618
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioners’ request to reissue the BIA’s July 22, 2004 decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal. After review of the filings and the record in this case, this court finds the petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to reissue its prior decision. Cf. Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal remains in effect pending issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent. This case, and the 60 others like it filed today, will have an adverse effect on children born in the United States whose parent/parents are illegal immigrants. When a parent is denied cancellation of removal, the government effectively deports the United States-born ehildren of that parent. This unconscionable result violates due process by forcing children either to suffer de facto expulsion from the country of their birth or forego their constitutionally-protected right to remain in this country with their family intact. See, e.g., Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494, 503-05 , 97 S.Ct. 1932 , 52 L.Ed.2d 531 (1977) (“Our decisions establish that the Constitution protects the sanctity of the family precisely because the institution of the family is deeply rooted in this nation’s history and tradition.”); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972) (recognizing that “[t]he integrity of the family unit has found protection in the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment”). Furthermore, as a nation we should recognize that many who came here illegally and many children born of illegal immigrants serve and have served with honor and distinction in our military forces, and many have laid down their lives on the altar of freedom. As I have said before, “I pray that soon the good men and women in our Congress will ameliorate the plight of families like the [petitioners] and give us humane laws that will not cause the disintegration of such families.” Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 1006, 1015 (9th Cir.2005).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hernandez v. Keisler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 18, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644618 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →