FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630061
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Hernandez v. Gonzales

No. 8630061 · Decided April 9, 2007
No. 8630061 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 9, 2007
Citation
No. 8630061
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument because the motion to reopen filed with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) was properly denied as both time and numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument because the motion to reopen filed with the Boar
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument because the motion to reopen filed with the Boar
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hernandez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 9, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630061 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →