Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Hernandez-Corral v. Gonzales
No. 8628687 · Decided February 26, 2007
No. 8628687·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8628687
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Hernandez-Corral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *672 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. Hernandez-Corral contends the BIA erred in denying her motion to reopen based on her parents’ recent attainment of lawful permanent resident status. In its July 21, 2005 decision, however, the BIA denied Hernandez-Corral’s motion to reopen as numerically barred, and she has not demonstrated that the BIA abused its discretion in denying that motion to reopen on this basis. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 596-600 (9th Cir.2006). The information regarding Hernandez-Corral’s parents’ attainment of legal permanent residence status was not before the BIA when it made its decision, and is not now properly before us. Hernandez-Corral’s petition for review is denied without prejudice to her initiating further proceedings before the BIA. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Hernandez-Corral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *672 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Hernandez-Corral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *672 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen.
02Hernandez-Corral contends the BIA erred in denying her motion to reopen based on her parents’ recent attainment of lawful permanent resident status.
03In its July 21, 2005 decision, however, the BIA denied Hernandez-Corral’s motion to reopen as numerically barred, and she has not demonstrated that the BIA abused its discretion in denying that motion to reopen on this basis.
04The information regarding Hernandez-Corral’s parents’ attainment of legal permanent residence status was not before the BIA when it made its decision, and is not now properly before us.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Hernandez-Corral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *672 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hernandez-Corral v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628687 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.