Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Haryasyah v. Mukasey
No. 8689059 · Decided September 8, 2008
No. 8689059·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 8, 2008
Citation
No. 8689059
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ho Agustinus Haryasyah, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review Haryas-yah’s contention that he was deprived of a full and fair hearing due to errors in the administrative record, because he failed to raise it before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Ho Agustinus Haryasyah, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withho
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Ho Agustinus Haryasyah, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withho
02We lack jurisdiction to review Haryas-yah’s contention that he was deprived of a full and fair hearing due to errors in the administrative record, because he failed to raise it before the BIA.
03Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Ho Agustinus Haryasyah, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withho
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Haryasyah v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 8, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689059 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.