Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626474
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Harrison v. City of North Las Vegas
No. 8626474 · Decided December 1, 2006
No. 8626474·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8626474
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is granted because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Jacobsen v. Filler, 790 F.2d 1362, 1366-67 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding that the district court was not required to give notice of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56’s evidentiary standards to a non-incarcerated pro se litigant). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is granted because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is granted because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Jacobsen v.
031986) (holding that the district court was not required to give notice of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56’s evidentiary standards to a non-incarcerated pro se litigant).
04Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is granted because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Harrison v. City of North Las Vegas in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626474 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.