Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8675727
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Hanna v. Mukasey
No. 8675727 · Decided May 27, 2008
No. 8675727·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 27, 2008
Citation
No. 8675727
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Samir Hanna, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (h). We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Hanna failed to show extreme hardship to a qualifying relative and therefore did not merit a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (h). 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i) (“Notwithstanding any other provision of law ... no court shall have jurisdiction to review[ ] any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section [1182(h)]....”); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 654 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (stating that the REAL ID Act “does not restore jurisdiction over discretionary determinations”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Samir Hanna, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibil
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Samir Hanna, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibil
02We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Hanna failed to show extreme hardship to a qualifying relative and therefore did not merit a waiver under 8 U.S.C.
03§ 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i) (“Notwithstanding any other provision of law ...
04no court shall have jurisdiction to review[ ] any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section [1182(h)]....”); Ramadan v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Samir Hanna, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibil
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hanna v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 27, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8675727 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.