FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642698
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Hagel v. Portland State University

No. 8642698 · Decided May 15, 2007
No. 8642698 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8642698
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Hagel appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Appellees. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part the district court’s order. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Portland State University as a defendant. The University is an arm of *148 the state of Oregon and, therefore, immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. See Rounds v. Or. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 166 F.3d 1032 , 1035 (9th Cir.1999). We also affirm the district court’s holding that the Appellees afforded Hagel adequate procedural due process with regard to his suspension. The district court properly balanced Hagel’s due process rights with the concerns for the safety and well-being of students, staff, and campus property. We reverse the district court’s dismissal of Hagel’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim relating to his loss of housing. The district court dismissed this claim based on claim preclusion. Claim preclusion applies if there is “(1) an identity of claims; (2) a final judgment on the merits; and (3) identity or privity between parties.” Providence Health Plan v. McDowell, 385 F.3d 1168, 1174 (9th Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Because the Oregon Court of Appeals subsequently reversed the case upon which the district court relied for its holding, there is no longer a final judgment. Under Oregon law, once a decision has been reversed, it no longer has preclusive effect. Cmty. Bank v. Vassil, 280 Or. 139 , 570 P.2d 66, 68-69 (1977). 1 Accordingly, we reverse the district court and remand for further proceedings, including an examination of any potential abstention issues. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . Oregon law governs whether claim preclusion applies. See Dodd v. Hood River County, 59 F.3d 852, 861-62 (9th Cir.1995).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Hagel appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Appellees.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Hagel appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Appellees.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hagel v. Portland State University in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642698 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →