Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630852
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gutierrez v. Gonzales
No. 8630852 · Decided April 30, 2007
No. 8630852·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2007
Citation
No. 8630852
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Fredy Arreola Gutierrez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arreola Gutierrez’s motion to reconsider as untimely because it was filed more than ten months after the BIA issued its final order of removal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2) (requiring that motions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days of the BIA’s final decision). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Fredy Arreola Gutierrez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applicati
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Fredy Arreola Gutierrez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applicati
02Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arreola Gutierrez’s motion to reconsider as untimely because it was filed more than ten months after the BIA issued its final order of removal.
04§ 1003.2 (b)(2) (requiring that motions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days of the BIA’s final decision).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Fredy Arreola Gutierrez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applicati
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gutierrez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630852 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.