Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623654
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Guillermo v. Gonzales
No. 8623654 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623654·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623654
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Blanco Galvez Guillermo and Silvia Sanchez-Castrejon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) *465 denial of their motion to reconsider the Board’s earlier denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings. The Board acted within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider because petitioners failed to demonstrate any errors of fact or law in the Board’s earlier decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1); Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176 , 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). Petitioners’ contention that the Board failed to adequately consider the factors in their case is not supported by the record. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Blanco Galvez Guillermo and Silvia Sanchez-Castrejon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) *465 denial of their motion to reconsider the Board’s earlier deni
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Blanco Galvez Guillermo and Silvia Sanchez-Castrejon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) *465 denial of their motion to reconsider the Board’s earlier deni
02The Board acted within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider because petitioners failed to demonstrate any errors of fact or law in the Board’s earlier decision.
03Petitioners’ contention that the Board failed to adequately consider the factors in their case is not supported by the record.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Blanco Galvez Guillermo and Silvia Sanchez-Castrejon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) *465 denial of their motion to reconsider the Board’s earlier deni
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Guillermo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623654 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.