FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623797
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Guillen v. Gonzales

No. 8623797 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623797 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623797
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Imelda Marcela Rodriguez Guillen, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez Guillen’s motion to reopen because she failed to demonstrate the evidence she submitted regarding her daughter’s medical condition and molestation was previously unavailable. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2 (a) and (c); Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Imelda Marcela Rodriguez Guillen, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Imelda Marcela Rodriguez Guillen, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Guillen v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623797 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →