FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697822
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Green v. Unaatuq, LLC (In re Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska)

No. 8697822 · Decided September 26, 2016
No. 8697822 · Ninth Circuit · 2016 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 26, 2016
Citation
No. 8697822
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER AMENDING The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page three line six by adding new footnote one, which states: Clainaants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails. Claimants filed a Rule 60(b)(4) motion in the bankruptcy court seeking relief from the prior sale order, arguing that they had acquired title to a portion of the Property through adverse possession. See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif [— U.S. —], 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1939 [ 91 L.Ed.2d 911 ] (2015) (stating there is no jurisdictional defect “when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy judge”). With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.
Plain English Summary
ORDER AMENDING The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page three line six by adding new footnote one, which states: Clainaants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER AMENDING The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page three line six by adding new footnote one, which states: Clainaants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Green v. Unaatuq, LLC (In re Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska) in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 26, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697822 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →