Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gray v. County of Riverside
No. 8641559 · Decided June 12, 2007
No. 8641559·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 12, 2007
Citation
No. 8641559
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** On March 15, 2007, this court issued an order denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and ordering appellants to show cause why the *553 judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. Our review of the record and of appellants’ response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** On March 15, 2007, this court issued an order denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and ordering appellants to show cause why the *553 judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affi
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** On March 15, 2007, this court issued an order denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and ordering appellants to show cause why the *553 judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affi
02Our review of the record and of appellants’ response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
03The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
MEMORANDUM ** On March 15, 2007, this court issued an order denying appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and ordering appellants to show cause why the *553 judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affi
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gray v. County of Riverside in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 12, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641559 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.