FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gonzalez-Varela v. Mukasey

No. 8646940 · Decided January 10, 2008
No. 8646940 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8646940
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Juan Gonzalez-Varela seeks review of the Board of Immigration Ap *574 peals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen as untimely. A review of the record reflects that the BIA entered its final decision on March 28, 2003, and accordingly any motion to reopen or to reconsider would have been due on or before April 28, 2003. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b). In this case, petitioner filed his motion to reopen on April 5, 2007. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Juan Gonzalez-Varela seeks review of the Board of Immigration Ap *574 peals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen as untimely.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Juan Gonzalez-Varela seeks review of the Board of Immigration Ap *574 peals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen as untimely.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez-Varela v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8646940 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →