Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gonzalez v. Gonzales
No. 8623940 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623940·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623940
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Lilia Cruz Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. To the extent *471 we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. See Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to consider Cruz Gonzalez’s contention that the agency misapplied relevant case law in its hardship determination. See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001). Contrary to Cruz Gonzalez’s contention, the agency’s interpretation of the hardship standard falls within the broad range authorized by the statute. See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001, 1004-06 (9th Cir.2003). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Lilia Cruz Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of remova
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Lilia Cruz Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of remova
02To the extent *471 we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C.
03We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings.
04We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Lilia Cruz Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of remova
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623940 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.