Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689112
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gonzalez-Morales v. Mukasey
No. 8689112 · Decided September 12, 2008
No. 8689112·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 12, 2008
Citation
No. 8689112
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Alejandro Gonzalez-Morales, and Maria Isabel Oroeio Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying then-application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners have failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 827 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioners’ contention that the IJ and the BIA failed to adequately consider and weigh all the evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”) PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Alejandro Gonzalez-Morales, and Maria Isabel Oroeio Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order de
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Alejandro Gonzalez-Morales, and Maria Isabel Oroeio Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order de
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners have failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives.
03Petitioners’ contention that the IJ and the BIA failed to adequately consider and weigh all the evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim.
04Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”) PETITION FOR REVIEW DI
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Alejandro Gonzalez-Morales, and Maria Isabel Oroeio Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order de
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez-Morales v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 12, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689112 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.