FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646562
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gonzalez-Lopez v. Mukasey

No. 8646562 · Decided December 28, 2007
No. 8646562 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 28, 2007
Citation
No. 8646562
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Lorena Gonzalez-Lopez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigra *976 tion Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. . The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Gonzalez-Lopez’s motion to reopen, where the BIA considered the evidence she submitted regarding her daughters and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Lorena Gonzalez-Lopez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigra *976 tion Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Lorena Gonzalez-Lopez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigra *976 tion Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez-Lopez v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 28, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646562 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →