Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624173
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gonzalez-Ayala v. Gonzales
No. 8624173 · Decided August 11, 2006
No. 8624173·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 11, 2006
Citation
No. 8624173
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The court has reviewed petitioner’s response to the court’s May 8, 2006 order to show cause, and has determined that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); United States v. Jimenez, 258 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that the “term of imprisonment” requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(F) includes any time served due to a post-sentencing probation violation, even if originally imposed as a suspended sentence). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The court has reviewed petitioner’s response to the court’s May 8, 2006 order to show cause, and has determined that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The court has reviewed petitioner’s response to the court’s May 8, 2006 order to show cause, and has determined that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); United States v.
03Jimenez, 258 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that the “term of imprisonment” requirement of 8 U.S.C.
04§ 1101 (a)(43)(F) includes any time served due to a post-sentencing probation violation, even if originally imposed as a suspended sentence).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The court has reviewed petitioner’s response to the court’s May 8, 2006 order to show cause, and has determined that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez-Ayala v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 11, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624173 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.