Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628858
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gonzales v. Gonzales
No. 8628858 · Decided February 26, 2007
No. 8628858·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8628858
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further ar *626 gument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying the second motion for reconsideration. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further ar *626 gument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further ar *626 gument.
03The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying the second motion for reconsideration.
04The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further ar *626 gument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzales v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628858 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.