Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630898
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gomez-Rodriguez v. Gonzales
No. 8630898 · Decided April 30, 2007
No. 8630898·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2007
Citation
No. 8630898
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Maria del Rosario Gomez-Rodriguez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. Gomez-Rodriguez’s contention that the agency violated her due process rights by disregarding her evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). We deny Gomez-Rodriguez’s second motion for an extension of time to file an optional reply brief. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Maria del Rosario Gomez-Rodriguez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Maria del Rosario Gomez-Rodriguez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
02Gomez-Rodriguez’s contention that the agency violated her due process rights by disregarding her evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim.
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04We deny Gomez-Rodriguez’s second motion for an extension of time to file an optional reply brief.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Maria del Rosario Gomez-Rodriguez petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gomez-Rodriguez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630898 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.