Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629726
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gerald v. Gonzales
No. 8629726 · Decided March 21, 2007
No. 8629726·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8629726
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Howard Ishmael Gerald, a native and citizen of Montserrat, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s decision denying Gerald’s application for cancellation of removal based on the discretionary determination that the negative factors outweighed the positive factors in Gerald’s record. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); see also Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 882, 884 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that judicial review is precluded with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of discretion). Because we do not have jurisdiction over the discretionary denial of Gerald’s cancellation of removal application, we do not consider his challenge to the BIA’s streamlining procedure. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 855 (9th Cir.2003). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Howard Ishmael Gerald, a native and citizen of Montserrat, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Howard Ishmael Gerald, a native and citizen of Montserrat, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s decision denying Gerald’s application for cancellation of removal based on the discretionary determination that the negative factors outweighed the positive factors in Gerald’s record.
032005) (noting that judicial review is precluded with respect to decisions that constitute an exercise of discretion).
04Because we do not have jurisdiction over the discretionary denial of Gerald’s cancellation of removal application, we do not consider his challenge to the BIA’s streamlining procedure.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Howard Ishmael Gerald, a native and citizen of Montserrat, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gerald v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 21, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629726 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.