Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Gardner Engineering, Inc., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, Local 350, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-Cio, Respondent-Intervenor
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 721565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Gardner Engineering, Inc., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, Local 350, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-Cio, Respondent-Intervenor
No. 721565 · Decided July 10, 1996
No. 721565·Ninth Circuit · 1996·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 10, 1996
Citation
No. 721565
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Gardner Engineering, Inc., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, Local 350, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-Cio, Respondent-Intervenor is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Gardner Engineering, Inc., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, Local 350, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-Cio, Respondent-Intervenor in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 10, 1996.
Use the citation No. 721565 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.