FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Garcia v. Gonzales

No. 8629646 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 8629646 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8629646
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Petronilo Cruz Garcia and Consuelo Gomez Roman and Petroni-lo’s children Fredy, Jazmin and Hector Cruz Mendez seek review of the orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that the adult petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003), and petitioners do not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contention that the IJ denied them a full and fair hearing because they failed to raise it before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). Petitioners do not challenge the IJ’s determination that Fredy, Jazmin and Hector Cruz Mendez did not establish ten years continuous physical presence and lack a qualifying relative. Petitioners’ contention that placing them in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings violated equal protection is unavailing. See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir. 2003); Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2002). We do not consider the adult petitioners’ contentions regarding good moral character and continuous physical presence, be *552 cause their failure to establish hardship is dispositive. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Petronilo Cruz Garcia and Consuelo Gomez Roman and Petroni-lo’s children Fredy, Jazmin and Hector Cruz Mendez seek review of the orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judg
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Husband and wife Petronilo Cruz Garcia and Consuelo Gomez Roman and Petroni-lo’s children Fredy, Jazmin and Hector Cruz Mendez seek review of the orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judg
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Garcia v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629646 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →