Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642291
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gantt v. Scribner
No. 8642291 · Decided July 20, 2007
No. 8642291·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8642291
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** 1. The district court didn’t clearly err in finding that the state failed to disclose the disputed evidence at a time when it would have been useful, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 , 105 S.Ct. 1504 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985). 2. Respondent doesn’t offer any substantial reason for departing from the law of the case and reversing Gantt v. Roe, 389 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.2004). See Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. of America, 902 F.2d 703, 715 (9th Cir.1990). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
The district court didn’t clearly err in finding that the state failed to disclose the disputed evidence at a time when it would have been useful, as required by Brady v.
Key Points
01The district court didn’t clearly err in finding that the state failed to disclose the disputed evidence at a time when it would have been useful, as required by Brady v.
02Respondent doesn’t offer any substantial reason for departing from the law of the case and reversing Gantt v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
The district court didn’t clearly err in finding that the state failed to disclose the disputed evidence at a time when it would have been useful, as required by Brady v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gantt v. Scribner in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642291 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.