Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626872
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Funtanilla v. Pliler
No. 8626872 · Decided December 12, 2006
No. 8626872·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 12, 2006
Citation
No. 8626872
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Gregorio C. Funtanilla, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2254 petition, see McQuillion v. Duncan, 306 F.3d 895, 899 (9th Cir.2002). Funtanilla contends that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2254 petition as proeedurally defaulted. We disagree, and we affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its decision filed on July 26, 2005. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
02We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2254 petition, see McQuillion v.
03Funtanilla contends that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2254 petition as proeedurally defaulted.
04We disagree, and we affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its decision filed on July 26, 2005.
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Funtanilla v. Pliler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 12, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626872 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.