Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Fulgham v. Campbell
No. 8646975 · Decided January 16, 2008
No. 8646975·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 16, 2008
Citation
No. 8646975
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Aaron E. Fulgham, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Fulgham was tried and convicted of murder and other charges in California state court along with co-defendant Rudy James Murphy. Both are serving sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Murphy and Fulgham filed separate habeas petitions challenging their state court convictions on the ground that the trial court violated them Sixth Amendment rights to a verdict free from coercion when the trial judge dismissed a juror for refusing to deliberate. We rejected this claim in the Murphy appeal and we follow that ruling here. For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Memorandum in Murphy v. Lamarque, No. 06-15585, — Fed.Appx. -, 2008 WL 121008 (9th Cir. Jan. 11, 2008), we AFFIRM. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Fulgham, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01Fulgham, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
02Fulgham was tried and convicted of murder and other charges in California state court along with co-defendant Rudy James Murphy.
03Both are serving sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
04Murphy and Fulgham filed separate habeas petitions challenging their state court convictions on the ground that the trial court violated them Sixth Amendment rights to a verdict free from coercion when the trial judge dismissed a juror for
Frequently Asked Questions
Fulgham, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Fulgham v. Campbell in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 16, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8646975 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.