Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688155
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Franklin v. Horel
No. 8688155 · Decided July 25, 2008
No. 8688155·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 25, 2008
Citation
No. 8688155
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** On May 27, 2008, this court denied appellant’s request for a certificate of appeal-ability as unnecessary because he is not challenging a conviction or imposition of sentence. By same order, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order Denying Motion for Relief from Judgement or Order dated July 27, 2007. A review of appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All outstanding motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** On May 27, 2008, this court denied appellant’s request for a certificate of appeal-ability as unnecessary because he is not challenging a conviction or imposition of sentence.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** On May 27, 2008, this court denied appellant’s request for a certificate of appeal-ability as unnecessary because he is not challenging a conviction or imposition of sentence.
02By same order, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order Denying Motion for Relief from Judgement or Order dated July 27, 2007.
03A review of appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
MEMORANDUM ** On May 27, 2008, this court denied appellant’s request for a certificate of appeal-ability as unnecessary because he is not challenging a conviction or imposition of sentence.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Franklin v. Horel in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 25, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688155 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.