Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Formulabs, Incorporated, Clarence Schreur an Gordon S. Lacy v. Hartley Pen Company, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company,appellee. Hartley Pen Company, a California Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartleyco. v. The Honorable William C. Mathes, Judge of the United States District Court Forthe Southern District of California, Central Division, E. I. Dupontde Nemours & Company, a Delaware Corporation, and the Real Party in Interest,respondent, Formulabs, Incorporated, a California Corporation Clarenceschreur, Individually, Gordon S. Lacy, Individually, Pacific Researchlaboratory, a Partnership, Formulabs, Incorporated, a Corporation, Clarence Schreur, and Gordon S. Lacy, Individuals Doing Business as Pacific Research Laboratory, a Co-Partnership v. Hartley Pen Company, a Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartley Co., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, a Corporation
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 260871
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Formulabs, Incorporated, Clarence Schreur an Gordon S. Lacy v. Hartley Pen Company, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company,appellee. Hartley Pen Company, a California Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartleyco. v. The Honorable William C. Mathes, Judge of the United States District Court Forthe Southern District of California, Central Division, E. I. Dupontde Nemours & Company, a Delaware Corporation, and the Real Party in Interest,respondent, Formulabs, Incorporated, a California Corporation Clarenceschreur, Individually, Gordon S. Lacy, Individually, Pacific Researchlaboratory, a Partnership, Formulabs, Incorporated, a Corporation, Clarence Schreur, and Gordon S. Lacy, Individuals Doing Business as Pacific Research Laboratory, a Co-Partnership v. Hartley Pen Company, a Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartley Co., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, a Corporation
No. 260871 · Decided July 6, 1963
No. 260871·Ninth Circuit · 1963·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 6, 1963
Citation
No. 260871
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Formulabs, Incorporated, Clarence Schreur an Gordon S. Lacy v. Hartley Pen Company, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company,appellee. Hartley Pen Company, a California Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartleyco. v. The Honorable William C. Mathes, Judge of the United States District Court Forthe Southern District of California, Central Division, E. I. Dupontde Nemours & Company, a Delaware Corporation, and the Real Party in Interest,respondent, Formulabs, Incorporated, a California Corporation Clarenceschreur, Individually, Gordon S. Lacy, Individually, Pacific Researchlaboratory, a Partnership, Formulabs, Incorporated, a Corporation, Clarence Schreur, and Gordon S. Lacy, Individuals Doing Business as Pacific Research Laboratory, a Co-Partnership v. Hartley Pen Company, a Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartley Co., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, a Corporation is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Formulabs, Incorporated, Clarence Schreur an Gordon S. Lacy v. Hartley Pen Company, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company,appellee. Hartley Pen Company, a California Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartleyco. v. The Honorable William C. Mathes, Judge of the United States District Court Forthe Southern District of California, Central Division, E. I. Dupontde Nemours & Company, a Delaware Corporation, and the Real Party in Interest,respondent, Formulabs, Incorporated, a California Corporation Clarenceschreur, Individually, Gordon S. Lacy, Individually, Pacific Researchlaboratory, a Partnership, Formulabs, Incorporated, a Corporation, Clarence Schreur, and Gordon S. Lacy, Individuals Doing Business as Pacific Research Laboratory, a Co-Partnership v. Hartley Pen Company, a Corporation, Doing Business as the Hartley Co., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, a Corporation in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 6, 1963.
Use the citation No. 260871 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.