Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8675645
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Flores-Ramirez v. Mukasey
No. 8675645 · Decided May 27, 2008
No. 8675645·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 27, 2008
Citation
No. 8675645
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Flores-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for relief under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary denial of relief because Flores-Ramirez’s contention that the IJ deprived him of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of his case does not state a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); see also Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir. 2001) (the agency’s “misapplication of relevant case law” may not be reviewed in this context). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Flores-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for relief under former
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Flores-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for relief under former
02We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary denial of relief because Flores-Ramirez’s contention that the IJ deprived him of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of his case does not state a colorable due process claim.
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); see also Sanchez-Cr
042001) (the agency’s “misapplication of relevant case law” may not be reviewed in this context).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Flores-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for relief under former
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Flores-Ramirez v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 27, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8675645 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.