FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Flores-Flores v. Sessions

No. 8699375 · Decided April 19, 2017
No. 8699375 · Ninth Circuit · 2017 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 19, 2017
Citation
No. 8699375
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Clemente Flores-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap *600 peals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny Flores-Flores’s petition for review because he does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s dispositive adverse credibility determination. See Lo pez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are deemed waived). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Clemente Flores-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap *600 peals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for wit
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Clemente Flores-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap *600 peals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for wit
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Flores-Flores v. Sessions in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 19, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699375 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →