FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9510800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Festus Ohan v. Ama

No. 9510800 · Decided June 4, 2024
No. 9510800 · Ninth Circuit · 2024 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 4, 2024
Citation
No. 9510800
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN, No. 23-35571 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00047-SLG v. MEMORANDUM* AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS; FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARD, (FSMB); AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 29, 2024** Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Festus Okwudili Ohan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action related to purported takings of his property, among other things. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. In his opening brief, Ohan failed to address the grounds for dismissal and has therefore forfeited his challenge to the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we cannot manufacture arguments for an appellant and therefore we will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). All pending motions are denied. AFFIRMED. 2 23-35571
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Festus Ohan v. Ama in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 4, 2024.
Use the citation No. 9510800 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →