Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627853
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Fernandez v. Carey
No. 8627853 · Decided January 16, 2007
No. 8627853·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8627853
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Joaquin Fernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. Fernandez contends that the California trial court erroneously admitted into evidence a statement by him that was obtained in violation of his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and that this error was not harmless. After reviewing the record, we conclude that Fernandez is not entitled to federal habeas relief because the California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably apply federal law as established by the United States Supreme Court when it held that the admission of the statement was harmless. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, 18 , 124 S.Ct. 7 , 157 L.Ed.2d 263 (2003) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Joaquin Fernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Joaquin Fernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
02Fernandez contends that the California trial court erroneously admitted into evidence a statement by him that was obtained in violation of his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and that this error was not harmless.
03After reviewing the record, we conclude that Fernandez is not entitled to federal habeas relief because the California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably apply federal law as established by the United States Supreme Court when it held tha
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Joaquin Fernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Fernandez v. Carey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8627853 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.